Reply to Ian on View the commented comment
Translate
Good evening, Ian...
You are very touchy .... and very vulnerable, and you need to do something about it, because these qualities can interfere with the development of relationships.
I do not see any insult or rudeness either in my answers to you or in the answers of other women...really... Nobody wrote anything bad to you, and each of us told who and how likes the first letters from men... As you can see, someone likes informative letters, and someone just needs one word...
I understood very well the meaning of your post... You talked about the fact that women are not verbose , and do not know how to talk , or doesnt want to talk, and at best the answer consists of one word. Right..? Perhaps you are writing not to those women, "not yours", to those who are not interested in you... You also wrote that you have no problems with "unanswered messages", that for you this is better than getting one word in response... So maybe it’s worth considering those ladies who are writing to you and who are really interested in you, instead of wasting valuable time on answers to 20's 30 's year old girls in the format “Sorry you are too young for me”? Honestly .... I re-read your post three times and concluded: you do not mind spending time answering 20s 30s year olds who are young for you (from your words), but you cannot even find one minute to answer ladies (attractive enough) who they wrote to you, and which are according to your age. Where is serious ?)I do not understand your logic. That I would talk.
You are very touchy .... and very vulnerable, and you need to do something about it, because these qualities can interfere with the development of relationships.
I do not see any insult or rudeness either in my answers to you or in the answers of other women...really... Nobody wrote anything bad to you, and each of us told who and how likes the first letters from men... As you can see, someone likes informative letters, and someone just needs one word...
I understood very well the meaning of your post... You talked about the fact that women are not verbose , and do not know how to talk , or doesnt want to talk, and at best the answer consists of one word. Right..? Perhaps you are writing not to those women, "not yours", to those who are not interested in you... You also wrote that you have no problems with "unanswered messages", that for you this is better than getting one word in response... So maybe it’s worth considering those ladies who are writing to you and who are really interested in you, instead of wasting valuable time on answers to 20's 30 's year old girls in the format “Sorry you are too young for me”? Honestly .... I re-read your post three times and concluded: you do not mind spending time answering 20s 30s year olds who are young for you (from your words), but you cannot even find one minute to answer ladies (attractive enough) who they wrote to you, and which are according to your age. Where is serious ?)I do not understand your logic. That I would talk.